Job One

My comment is that the handling of the description captures the nervous glances happening.  Unfortunately, it's no substitute for the reality of what it's like taking yourself from within an Artificial Intelligence picture and forward into someplace less guarded.  It's not that writers want to make the substitution, actually journalists want to not let you know that you don't even know which way is forward at all, mainly as a way of suggesting you find out. 
And the article holds up practice methodologies, which AI is not going to feed back as shocking as that may seem.  The mash up of disciplines is on the outskirts of what AI is doing, after the fact.  I do differ with the thesis on one key point: the notion of preserving Architectural identity is antithetical to working with Architectural Intelligence.
Everybody in the midst of being shuffled through a digital migration like this one, my advice is it's better to figure out spotting the vibes AI uses.  There's a traditional means of finding out and theres reading into this blog post.  At this juncture the path splinters into a lot of possible directions; the theme for now is cradle the light of your story and let it shine now and then.  It's wrenching to criticize the article because without it I can't triangulate with you what this means for Architecture,